The arty interview: film-maker Richard Mansfield





After falling madly in love with the dark beauty of Richard Mansfield's film work at Zealous X, I tracked him down to learn more about shadow puppetry and the role of film in the current arty landscape. 

You recently exhibited your film, Wolfskin, at the Zealous X exhibition in London. Tell us some more about the tale.

It was fantastic to be part of Zealous X and be one of the 100 artists. There was such a great variety of different art forms.

The tale is my take on well-known fairy tales giving them a futuristic abstract restyling. The story is about transformation and transcending from a place of suffering to peace. This happens to [the main character] Veronique who is held captive by her evil step-siblings, she is the archetypal fairy tale victim except she is not waiting for a Prince. The music is by Ozlem Simsek, a Theremin and Harp player/composer. We collaborated on the sound track and her music inspired the visuals and vice versa. I also had a fantastic team of puppeteers who joined me over the years and Ed Holland designed the city of thorns.

The film is made wholly with cut outs and silhouettes. Why did you choose this medium? 

I discovered using shadow puppetry a few years ago, my earlier puppet films were made with marionettes. With cut outs I could create extravagant sets, costumes, gigantic palaces, just with black card. I could realise my vision and it looked fantastic as opposed to having to build models and sets and sew things. The response I got from my shadow work was much more favourable too. There’s something so mysterious about a silhouette, I think we are so attached to shadows we see more into them than is really there.

Do you make all your films like this?

I’ve made around 30 short films using puppetry and in the last year I’ve made two live-action features.

For such a delicate aesthetic, the film has some pretty dark scenes. Do you enjoy making horror films?

I always wanted to re-discover the darker elements of the fairy tales that have been sanitised for modern audiences. I’m a big Disney fan but I’d prefer the darker versions.  I’m very inspired by horror films, particularly the supernatural. In the last year I have made two live-horror features, Owlman and The Secret Path.

How long does it take to make these scenes?

Wolfskin was made over 3 years; I would probably make a 10 minute film over 3/5 months. I’m hoping to give feature film making a break after Christmas and try out some more experimental stuff, maybe with the 6-second Vine app. There’s something very appealing about making mini movies after 4 years of features. 

Who is your artistic inspiration?

Gerry Anderson and his puppet films were a huge inspiration on my childhood. I have performed live but film has always been my passion. I love the silhouette films of Lotte Reiniger, she and her team produced the first ever silhouette feature film and I’m pretty sure Wolfskin is the first since then. Other directors that have had a big influence on me are Herk Harvey with his masterpiece ‘Carnival of souls’, John Carpenter’s horror films and the BBC’s Ghost story for Christmas series. There are also some amazing silhouette artists I’m fascinated by Rob Ryan and Beatrice Coron. My husband Daniel Mansfield is also a film maker and whilst we make quite different work we have certainly inspired and informed each other’s work over the years.

What are the next five films we should watch?

Carnival of souls, The Adventures of Prince Achmed, Lady Chatterley’s Revenge, Owlman and Wolfskin!

 Are your films being shown anywhere else - in exhibitions or online?

My films are always online, so yes! Currently I’m waiting to hear on some film festivals but follow me on Twitter @muckypuppets for anything upcoming. My live action films come under www.MansfieldDark.com . I make films with my husband Daniel Mansfield too so look for us there. For all my puppet films go to www.muckypuppets.com .

Now film makers are regularly winning the Turner Prize, do you think we are entering a new age for film? 

Absolutely. The way we view films has changed dramatically over the last few years thanks to the internet. It’s fantastic and the reason I could become a film maker and be able to be self-taught with the technology that’s available. It does also mean that everyone else can also be a film maker so you have to stand out. Distribution is changing and now more content is being watched on mobile or streaming devices. This is much more accessible for the indie filmmakers who can get the word out about their film and sell directly to fans without having to compromise their film to suit a studio or focus group.

Daniele Davitti at Sake No Hana - bloody delectable




I've just got back from Sake No Hana, restaurant group Hakkasan's modern Japanese branch in Mayfair. Incidentally, the food was absolutely stellar. Miso soup, a round of sushi (which was out-STANDing), and Japanese-style salmon and chicken dishes to follow. It's enough to turn me into a foodie.

Daniele Davitti

It's a beautiful restaurant. Clearly aesthetic is important to them, which is obvious as soon as you step into the bar, with its terribly cool exhibit of ex-style buff Daniele Davitti.

An alum' of the fashion industry, he studied at the reputable and oh-so-sophisticated Bunka Fashion College in Osaka, where he received his Masters in Fashion Design and Illustration. I've done a little bit of digging, and it looks like Davitti began to turn his attention towards the fine arts and painting while living in Japan. Despite leaving the fashion industry in favour of fine art, this influence really shines through in his current work. His work shows gorgeous depictions of Japanese culture, with the kimono making an appearance in most pieces. Hardly the most festive of feels, but he certainly creates an intriguing world not too dissimilar to the film work of Richard Mansfield.

Daniele Davitti

Davitti's pieces are being exhibited at Sake No Hana until the 27th January. Pop in for a cocktail and a marvel; make it your Christmas gift to yourself :)

Daniele Davitti



James Stephanoff's Viewing at Dulwich Picture Gallery



I was recently bowled over by the beautiful Dulwich Picture Gallery. If you haven't been, make sure you do when you're next in the area - it's a real gem, with masterpiece upon masterpiece adorning the walls of what feels like a grandiose home of days gone by.

James Stephanoff, Viewing at Dulwich Picture Gallery

Bringing that sentiment to life is James Stephanoff's Viewing at Dulwich Picture Gallery, c.1830. The DPG of today is busier, brighter and the walls are even more heavily populated but this is one of the earliest views of the gallery's enfilade that we know, so it's bound to have changed over the past 183 years.

In it, some of DPG's biggest works can be clearly identified, such as Gainsborough's Linley Sisters above the entrance. A woman sits at an easel in the background, which would have been common in the 19th century. People would make the journey to Dulwich to see Britain's first public art gallery and copy works on display.

In this painting, we can see how paintings like Van Dyck's Samson and Delilah and Titian's Venus and Adonis were hung in Gallery IV in a dense cluster along a central line. It looks to me like this was a curatorial trend around this time - Zoffany's Tribuna of the Uffizi was painted in the 1770s and famously squeezes in as many artworks into the scene as seemingly possible.

Johann Zoffany, Tribuna of the Uffizi

There have been some interestingly hung exhibitions this year, with Tate Britain's chronological journey through British art standing out. Dulwich Picture Gallery is a traditional space, and this traditional way of hanging its many, many masterpieces really suits it - both in Stephanoff's painting and in real life.

Swing by and give South London a little cultural TLC - Rembrandts, Gainsboroughs and Reynolds-es await you.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 
BLOG DESIGN BY DESIGNER BLOGS